What does Redirects / relevance mean in this evidence set?
Source-backed creator statements and evidence excerpts related to Redirects / relevance.
Topic evidence page
Redirects / relevance
Source-backed creator statements and evidence excerpts related to Redirects / relevance.
Questions this topic answers
iWhat do creators repeatedly say about Redirects / relevance?
If a changed URL redirects to an irrelevant page, the old ranking usually is not preserved; blanket homepage redirects can behave like soft 404s.
What should an SEO or AI visibility operator inspect first?
If a changed URL redirects to an irrelevant page, the old ranking usually is not preserved; blanket homepage redirects can behave like soft 404s.
How strong is the public evidence?
This topic currently has 1 source records, 1 public insight cards, and 1 creators in the public Base2026 export.
Top Creators
Public Insight Cards
If a changed URL redirects to an irrelevant page, the old ranking usually is not preserved; blanket homepage redirects can behave like soft 404s.
l actually gain ranking. This is because typically if you make significant site wide changes to your website this will force Google to re evaluate the content of your site. So if you've been working on your content or you have more authority than the last time Google evaluated your site you're likely to see a boost in ranking...
OpenRelated Source Records
How to Avoid Losing Ranking when Redoing Your Website: Don't remove pages or change URLs...
I keep talking to companies that have rebuilt their website and lost a bunch of their Google search traffic. It's so common. In my experience, I would say 90% of the time an organisation rebuilds their website, they lose a significant amount of their rankings in Google and it's always for the same reason and it's entirely avoidable, unfortunately...
OpenEvidence Passages
Short public snippets grouped with their source record, creator, and date.
I keep talking to companies that have rebuilt their website and lost a bunch of their Google search traffic. It's so common.
In my experience, I would say 90% of the time an organisation rebuilds their website, they lose a significant amount of their rankings in Google and it's always for the same reason and it's entirely avoidable, unfortunately. Typically when I'm talking to these companies, it's after they've already rebuilt their website and lost their ranking.
Now typically we can get most of their ranking back pretty quickly, but I wanna talk about how you can avoid this in the first place with a little bit of simple planning. So most of the time when a company rebuilds their website and loses ranking, they think, oh, I guess our pages aren't as optimized as they were on the old website.
Maybe we didn't get the right keyword in our meta title or our H1. And that definitely can happen.
But if anyone in the organization has any understanding of SEO, it's rare that that one's missed. The thing that is often missed even by SEO agencies is removing pages or changing URLs...
l actually gain ranking. This is because typically if you make significant site wide changes to your website this will force Google to re evaluate the content of your site.
So if you've been working on your content or you have more authority than the last time Google evaluated your site you're likely to see a boost in ranking. However, even after learning this I often hear organisations say ah we still wanna remove all these pages cause we want our new site to be clean but with a good site structure you don't have to choose between a clean website and keeping your pages but if you have pages ranking in Google and then you remove that page or change the URL you will lose that ranking.
Now occasionally a new page will start ranking for that term but it's rare. If you want to keep your ranking you need to keep your pages.
If you absolutely must remove a page or change a URL then you want to set up a redirect to the most relevant existing page. However, this is another thing that people commonly misunderstand...