What does AI productivity mean in this evidence set?
Source-backed creator statements and evidence excerpts related to AI productivity.
Topic evidence page
Source-backed creator statements and evidence excerpts related to AI productivity.
Source-backed creator statements and evidence excerpts related to AI productivity.
The creator says AI increased agency output: more deliverables at the same rate without reducing hiring.
The creator says AI increased agency output: more deliverables at the same rate without reducing hiring.
This topic currently has 1 source records, 1 public insight cards, and 1 creators in the public Base2026 export.
l positions. These are situations where all their work is still gonna be reviewed by me or another expert. Nowadays, when I'm hiring for these positions, I'm just gonna create an SOP in which the actual work is being done by an AI. So the person I'm hiring is just following the SOP, giving the task to AI, and then reviewing the AI's work...
OpenThere's been a lot of talk lately about how AI is gonna wipe out half of all entry level white collar jobs. As someone who is currently hiring and who works in, I think, the industry that's most disrupted by AI, digital marketing, I just wanna talk about my experience and how I kind of see this playing out right now...
OpenShort public snippets grouped with their source record, creator, and date.
There's been a lot of talk lately about how AI is gonna wipe out half of all entry level white collar jobs. As someone who is currently hiring and who works in, I think, the industry that's most disrupted by AI, digital marketing, I just wanna talk about my experience and how I kind of see this playing out right now.
I don't think we yet know what effect AI will have on jobs, but there are no shortage of examples where AI is as good or better than the average entry level person at a given task. Graphic designers, copywriters, developers, marketing strategists.
AI is already as good or better than the average entry level person in each of these fields. Now, of course it's not as good as the top people in these fields.
There's still plenty of room for experts. And even more importantly, these AI can't take those jobs.
You can't just fire your graphic designer and stick an AI there instead. There are still certain things you need a human to do that AI just can't yet do.
Things like understanding large amounts of context and working autonomously for days on end...
l positions. These are situations where all their work is still gonna be reviewed by me or another expert.
Nowadays, when I'm hiring for these positions, I'm just gonna create an SOP in which the actual work is being done by an AI. So the person I'm hiring is just following the SOP, giving the task to AI, and then reviewing the AI's work.
Now, when I say it like that, it makes it seem like I could just slot any human in that role, but it's really not the case. Good judgment, or in the case of creative work, good taste is incredibly important.
But what's much less important is the actual skills and knowledge to do the task. So as of right now, I'm still hiring for a lot of entry level positions.
I'm just not hiring people that are training for the specific task I'm giving them. And more crucially, to the point, they're able to output a lot more work than they would have a few years ago.
Because of AI. However, I'm actually not hiring any less than I would have a few years ago.
We're just doing a lot more work...