What does AI product quality mean in this evidence set?
Source-backed creator statements and evidence excerpts related to AI product quality.
Topic evidence page
AI product quality
Source-backed creator statements and evidence excerpts related to AI product quality.
Questions this topic answers
iWhat do creators repeatedly say about AI product quality?
AI tools that are only almost as good as a human may lose value as expectations rise; useful tools need to outperform humans on the task.
What should an SEO or AI visibility operator inspect first?
AI tools that are only almost as good as a human may lose value as expectations rise; useful tools need to outperform humans on the task.
How strong is the public evidence?
This topic currently has 1 source records, 1 public insight cards, and 1 creators in the public Base2026 export.
Top Creators
Public Insight Cards
AI tools that are only almost as good as a human may lose value as expectations rise; useful tools need to outperform humans on the task.
Has anyone else noticed that we've had AI that's about as good as humans at a lot of things for a while now? Almost no reputable companies are actually automating much with AI. And why is that? Well, I think it's because we're learning that about as good as a human isn't good enough if it's not at least as good of a human. It just feels like AI...
OpenRelated Source Records
AI that's "almost as good" is worthless now. The only tools that matter are ones that...
Has anyone else noticed that we've had AI that's about as good as humans at a lot of things for a while now? Almost no reputable companies are actually automating much with AI. And why is that? Well, I think it's because we're learning that about as good as a human isn't good enough if it's not at least as good of a human. It just feels like AI...
OpenEvidence Passages
Short public snippets grouped with their source record, creator, and date.
Has anyone else noticed that we've had AI that's about as good as humans at a lot of things for a while now? Almost no reputable companies are actually automating much with AI.
And why is that? Well, I think it's because we're learning that about as good as a human isn't good enough if it's not at least as good of a human.
It just feels like AI. It feels cheap, feels impersonal.
As AI just becomes more capable and people become more aware of what AI can do, our expectations go up. We have higher expectations for our software and higher expectations for humans.
What seemed magical two years ago is just standard today. So your vibe coded SAS product that can do an SEO audit of my website almost as well as a human can or can evaluate my tax return almost as well as a real accountant has effectively seen its value drop to zero.
We've reached a point where the only AI tools or processes that have any value are those that can do the job better than a human. And those do exist.
We're building them at my agency...
r standards for what an AI tool needs to do to have any value are going to continue to go up very quickly. So we're past the days where you can just vibe code a cool project over the weekend and impress everyone.
But if you have real domain expertise and you're willing to put in the time, 2026 seems to be the inflection point.