Alex Yarosh Get Free Snapshot

Source record

@build_in_public

2026-05-30

Collapsible FAQ content can be good UX, but fully visible FAQ text may perform better on pages targeting competitive SEO keywords.

Open in Search Workspace Open original Creator

Source Text

i

Don't put collapsible FAQs on pages you want to rank on Google.

This SEO test had text within an accordion versus fully visible text. This was split tested across many product pages. The version with text fully visible got 12% more organic sessions than the hidden text version.

Google even recently said they're ignoring FAQ schema altogether. Whereas it used to work well, now it does nothing for a website's visibility.

Collapsible FAQs can be great for UI/UX, but think twice about using them on SEO pages targeting competitive keywords.

com.

Source Intelligence

i

Collapsible FAQ content can be good UX, but fully visible FAQ text may perform better on pages targeting competitive SEO keywords.

FAQ SEO · asserts

For SEO-critical pages, test whether important FAQ answers should be visible by default rather than hidden in accordions.

Questions this source answers

i

What is this source mainly about?

Collapsible FAQ content can be good UX, but fully visible FAQ text may perform better on pages targeting competitive SEO keywords.

What should an operator take from it?

For SEO-critical pages, test whether important FAQ answers should be visible by default rather than hidden in accordions.

What public evidence supports the record?

This SEO test had text within an accordion versus fully visible text. This was split tested across many product pages. The version with text fully visible got 12% more organic sessions than the hidden text version.

How is this source attributed?

Base2026 attributes this public source record to @build_in_public, published 2026-05-30, with the original platform link and correction/removal path kept on the page.