Source record
SEO workflows benefit from specific research tools for keyword discovery, historical checks, backlink triage, citations, and search visibility diagnostics.
Am I the only person who feels that the data that I'm getting from Ahrefs is really just terrible at the moment? I look at dozens and dozens of websites on a daily basis. I look at my own websites and I look at industry leaders and I look on potential clients as well.
And I must tell you, the data that I'm getting from Ahrefs is just poor.
Never mind poor, it's inaccurate. If I look at that data compared to Search Console and compared to Semrush and data for s c 0, Ahrefs is really just nowhere on most results that I look under the keyword level. All the results are all over the place.
They've dropped dramatically.
And if I had to report these to clients, they'd get the fright of their life. But when I look deeply in it, the results are actually not as bad as Ahrefs is showing. I don't know what is wrong with a hrefs and I wish someone would tell me.
Most importantly, the SEO community, maybe you guys can help me as well.
But I don't know if it's worth keeping ahrefs for the type of data that I'm getting. Yes, a lot of the backlinking data is amazing and that's primarily what I use it for. But on reporting and the keyword research that I'm getting, it's very, very, very worrying.
If you're an ahrefs user, can you please explain to me what your thoughts are?
SEO workflows benefit from specific research tools for keyword discovery, historical checks, backlink triage, citations, and search visibility diagnostics.
Route each SEO task to the right tool, document the evidence found, and convert the output into a concrete page, citation, backlink, or technical action.
This source is connected to SEO research and tooling workflow.
If I look at that data compared to Search Console and compared to Semrush and data for s c 0, Ahrefs is really just nowhere on most results that I look under the keyword level.