According to Faqs, make websites do worse in SEO, an experiment was done to test the performance of text within tabs versus text that's fully visible. Text within tabs, fully visible. This is an accordion element.
These drop down. This is the drop down already visible.
The version with text fully visible got 12% more organic sessions than the text hidden within the tabs version. From a user experience perspective, people just want their answers fast. When it's dropped down like this, they get their answer really fast.
com.
Source Intelligence
i
An experiment is cited where fully visible FAQ/content text received 12% more organic sessions than the same text hidden inside accordion tabs.
Accordions / visible content experiment · asserts
Treat as a test candidate: for critical SEO answers, prefer visible content or run an A/B/SEO test before hiding important text in accordions.
An experiment is cited where fully visible FAQ/content text received 12% more organic sessions than the same text hidden inside accordion tabs.
What should an operator take from it?
Treat as a test candidate: for critical SEO answers, prefer visible content or run an A/B/SEO test before hiding important text in accordions.
Which topics does it connect to?
This source is connected to Accordions / visible content experiment.
What public evidence supports the record?
According to Faqs, make websites do worse in SEO, an experiment was done to test the performance of text within tabs versus text that's fully visible. Text within tabs, fully visible. This is an accordion element. These drop down. This is the drop down already visible...
Cookie preferences
We use necessary cookies to run the site and optional cookies to understand what pages are useful. You can accept all, reject non-essential cookies, or manage preferences.