Source record
We are witnessing the greatest win in SEO history. I just made a video about this site, it was at 5.5 million visits a month from Google. Two days later it's at 6 million...
We are witnessing the greatest win in SEO history. I just made a video about the site. 5 million visits a month from Google.
Two days later, it's at 6 million. A month and a half ago, it was at 300,000, or less than 300,000. They went from less than 300,000 visits a month from Google if SEO to over 6 million.
This is. This is stupid. Entirely AI generated content.
All AI generated. Beautiful templates. Tons of dependencies.
Depending on the type of article, the type of niche. There's going to be all these different modules in it. It's dynamic.
You can ask AI as you read. There's AI summaries, there's an AI podcast at the top. This is crazy.
Everything is AI written.
They go hard on social media and YouTube, too. They have a capybara and a monkey talking to each other, telling the news. Every part of this is synthesized by AI.
They did hire humans, though, real humans, to give a human touch to their AI content. But it is just so crazy. Under 300,000 visitors a month from Google to over 6 million.
A cited site allegedly grew from under 300k to over 6M Google visits/month using AI-generated content with strong templates, dynamic modules, AI summaries/podcasts, social distribution, and some human touch.
Treat as experiment evidence, not methodology: analyze whether success came from templates, UX, brand/social distribution, human review, or risky scaled AI content before copying.
This source is connected to AI-generated content / SEO experiment.
We are witnessing the greatest win in SEO history. I just made a video about the site. It was at 5.5 million visits a month from Google. Two days later, it's at 6 million. A month and a half ago, it was at 300,000, or less than 300,000. They went from less than 300,000 visits a month from Google if SEO to over 6 million. This is. This is stupid...