Alex Yarosh Get Free Snapshot

Source record

@tjrobertson52 TikTok profile avatar

@tjrobertson52

2024-08-03

SearchGPT vs Google Showdown ๐Ÿ  See how it handles specific local queries! Spoiler: AI struggles with accuracy ๐Ÿค– Interesting twist: Sometimes classic search still wins ๐Ÿ”...

Share source record
Tiktokexcerpt onlyen1

Source Text

i

Here's an example where someone might want to go to search GBT instead of Google. They know what they want, but they don't know the process of getting it. So I want to get my real estate license.

Is there a well-known reputable place that does that in Las Vegas, like a school or a course? I don't want to pay more than $500. Let's see how search GBT does with that.

I'm somewhat familiar with this space because of a client of ours. The results it gave me are not known to be the best real estate schools. Furthermore, as I pointed out in my follow up here, They didn't provide me links to the schools.

They provided links to articles that talk about this school, And that's not what I want if I'm looking to sign up for a course. Now, search GBT tried to correct itself, But in the second attempt, it just linked to Calibri on all four results. I pointed this out, and it did it again.

This seems to be the major problem with search GBT right now, Is it's just making stuff up. It's hallucinating. The same problem that large language models have.

See what Google says for that same search term? We're getting much better results here In terms of just being a search engine. Google is way better.

Source Intelligence

i

In one real-estate-school query, the creator says SearchGPT returned weak recommendations, poor links, and repeated hallucinated results compared with Google.

AI search risk ยท asserts

  • Treat AI search outputs as unverified research, especially for provider recommendations; check facts, links, and source quality before relying on them.

Questions this source answers

i

What is this source mainly about?

In one real-estate-school query, the creator says SearchGPT returned weak recommendations, poor links, and repeated hallucinated results compared with Google.

What should an operator take from it?

Treat AI search outputs as unverified research, especially for provider recommendations; check facts, links, and source quality before relying on them.

What public evidence supports the record?

Here's an example where someone might want to go to search GBT instead of Google. They know what they want, but they don't know the process of getting it. So I want to get my real estate license. Is there a well-known reputable place that does that in Las Vegas, like a school or a course? I don't want to pay more than $500...

How is this source attributed?

Base2026 attributes this public source record to @tjrobertson52, published 2024-08-03, with the original platform link and correction/removal path kept on the page.